A Nightmare on Elm Street - Samuel Bayer (2010)

[FENRIZ]

euh moi qui fait collection des figurines mc farlane et des figurines neca,celle la est franchement bien foirée!!!

[alf]

In light of last month's early test screening of Platinum Dunes reboot of A Nightmare On Elm Street, it appears reshoots are well under way for new additional scenes. Chud discovered the casting call sheet via the Spoiler TV site, which seems to primarily involve minor secondary characters that work with Nancy (Rooney Mara) at the diner.

Nightmare on Elm St - New Casting Call for Minor Characters

[WAITRESS] 40s. She works at the diner with NANCY. She started working at the diner as a summer job 20 years ago and never left. PLEASE SUBMIT CHARACTER ACTORS WITH GREAT FACES (Two lines)

[DUTCH] 50s. The owner of a small-town American diner at which NANCY works. PLEASE SUBMIT CHARACTER ACTORS WITH GREAT WEATHERED FACES. (One line)

[TEENAGE GUY] Eating at the diner with JESSE, QUENTIN and a FRIEND, he tells QUENTIN that asking NANCY about the diner specials doesn't count as talking to her. Please keep in mind that they must be playing high school age. Please submit all character types - from cool to charactery. (One line)

[FRIEND] Eating at the diner with JESSE, QUENTIN, and TEENAGE GUY, he asks what the point would be of getting to know someone when they all graduate in a few months anyway. Please keep in mind that they must be playing high school age. Please submit all character types - from cool to charactery. (One line)

Bon petits reshoots sachant que cette scène du Diner n'est pas dans la version que j'ai lue.

[Seb2]

Des news concernant la sortie eventuelle du score de jablonsky ? (editeur, date etc...)

[Fatalis rex]

Nouveau trailer : http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2010/ ... railer.php

Ca m'a l'air sympatoche.

[Superfly]

Freddy à l'air joué par un ado de 15ans

[san]

Une véritable infection! !ben ouhais, Freddy, c'est R englund.Produit par M "c'est vraiment du grand lait" bay Encore du nawak quoi! !!

Une préquelle, pourquoi pas...!mais un ...tain de remake, je l'ai déjà vu le film! ! Le pire: le film va certainement marcher(vu le nombre de visionnage des ba...)

Spoiler : :

c'est peut être là que les francais devraient chercher...en faisant un "faux remake" des films de M Bay...du type "Bad girl"....

[Bourdon David]

[Machet]

J'ai tout de suite pensé à cette affiche en voyant celle de Nightmare 2010...

[Seb2]

oui, mais celle de freddy est bien mieux... tout comme le film qui sera aussi mieux

[Homan]

Bizarrement ce remake je l'attend avec une certaine impatience, rien que pour voir la nouvelle forme que prendra Freddy, et en esperant qu'il retrouve ce coté effrayant qu'il avait dans le 1 et le 2, et pas redevenir le clown qu'il est devenu dans les suites (même si j'aime bien le 5)

En tout cas j'ai bon espoir pour ce film

[Corvis]

Freddy avec des CGI foireux (voir le mur), déjà c'est sans moi, sans appel...

[Superwonderscope]

En tous cas, le film sera classé "R" aux USA, déjà une bonne nouvelle pour les fans que nous sommes :

"strong bloody horror violence, disturbing images, terror and language."

[dario carpenter]

Lettre ouverte à Michael Bay:


An Open Letter to Michael Bay (and a sincere request to Horror Fans everywhere!)


During my five-year tenure as one of Rue Morgue Radio's resident 'Caustic Critics', I've suffered many an ignominious insult to this beloved genre in the hopes that you won't have to! So after such devoted, altruistic, self-immolation, I think I've earned the right to ask my fellow horror enthusiasts for a solid, right?

Well, allow me to cash in right now.

Earlier this week, I checked out the remake of Wes Craven's A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET, produced by Michael Bay's Platinum Dunes company, the same low-level fiends responsible for many of the worst horror remakes we've endured in recent years (Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Friday 13th...etc.)

So it should come as no surprise that the remake absolutely sucks. Given the history of Platinum Dunes and their long list of cinematic atrocities, it was practically a given. Although, I think this one managed to sink the knife in a little deeper.

Where to begin? First of all, there's been a lot of tiresome speculation about whether or not Jackie Earle Haley could pull off the role made famous by Robert Englund. I have one thing to say to that: who gives us fuck? That's the least of the film's problems. For the record, Haley was fine. He's not the issue.

Secondly, I'm not gonna rail against the injustice of this being yet another remake of a classic title...blah blah blah. Of course, there's no real 'artistic' justification for the flick but the film business is a tricky mistress and the remake has proven to be a successful business model. So I'm willing to cut these arseholes some slack on that front.

Alright, so we get the economics. We get the math. But I have to ask the filmmakers, why does the quality of the flick itself have to be an afterthought? Actually, fuck that! In this case, the quality of the flick itself wasn't even a consideration!

The original NIGHTMARE proceeds from a wonderful concept that sustained multiple sequels. I mean, a killer who gets you in your dreams? The possibilities are endless. But this incarnation is nothing more than a 'Rich Little-esque' fumbling impersonation of its predecessor. All the set pieces are plucked from the original albeit executed in a manner that fully underwhelms. And beyond Haley, most of the performances are truly dreadful, the writing is an embarrassment and stylistically, it's almost completely devoid of impact. It's never tense, it's never scary, it's never dreamy. Instead, it's wooden, lifeless, boring and I honestly couldn't find a shred of imagination on display anywhere at any point at any time.

So why not? Seriously? Given the financial safety net of the remake model, you could've had just about any concoction of ineptitude unspool before the audience for 90 minutes and you're still guaranteed to make some dough. Rob Zombie has mathematically proven this to be true! So why not get a little creative with it? Or at least "try" to get creative with it.

You didn't come up with the story. Craven did that. You didn't come up with the set pieces. Again, Craven. So what the fuck did you do, fellas? Honestly? I'll tell you what you did. You took a pay cheque and went to sleep.

You had the money, the resources and the power to let your macabre visions fly furious and wild. The marketing guys already did their job. Why didn't you do yours? They handed you a previously proven franchise. They handed you the bums on seats. And there we were, ready, willing and waiting to be terrorized by your dark imaginings. So why didn't you meet us half way?

You plundered pockets when you should've plundered nightmares!

But do you not care about your legacy? Do you not care about cinema? Do you think anyone who goes to the movies over the age of 25 is a total fucking arsehole?

So listen up, Michael Bay. As far as I'm concerned, you're guilty of crimes against the imagination. You stood on the shoulders of a giant only to take a massive shit on top of its head! And I think it's high time the fans wake the fuck up and stop being so easily entertained by your feeble efforts.

Now this is where we get to the favour in question.

Don't worry, I'm not gonna ask you fans to boycott this movie. Despite my warnings, I know you can't help but subjects yourselves to the agony, you masochistic chones!

But if you must go, if you really MUST go, then please, for the love of all that is sacred, don't fucking pay! Buy a ticket for something else, anything else and then sneak in if you truly insist on wrecking your retinas on this piece of shit. Even if you grab a ticket for the new Jennifer Lopez flick, I don't give a fuck. I just can't stand the thought of these criminals stealing your dough. I just can't stand the thought of these criminals making enough dough to justify even more crimes against the imagination.

And to my friends in the genre press who help dictate what constitutes 'good taste' in horror, do me a favour too! Stop celebrating such wankery! And stop being so fucking polite with this crap! Don't think you don't play a role in this. There's no need to make excuses for dick-brains like Michael Bay. Tell the truth. Call a spade a spade. Ask the hard questions. Inform the public!

And a final warning to Michael Bay!

Watch out! We got your number. Uwe Boll's not your only enemy. Keep ripping us off and we'll rob you blind in return! Even though it's a lamentable waste of bandwidth, we're more than happy to illegally download ALL your crap (even your godawful robot porn movies, you arsehole!) And if we choose to subject ourselves to your crap in the theatres, we're gonna give our money to Jennifer Lopez instead! And we fucking HATE Jennifer Lopez!

So try to remember - theatrically distributed narrative feature films are 50% commerce and 50% art. You got the commerce part right. But don't forget the 'art' part next time!

In the immortal words of Tom Atkins ....

THRILL ME!:

Stuart Feedback Andrews

http://www.ruemorgueradio.com
http://www.cinephobia-radio.com

[Karen]

Amen.

[Fy87]

Un peu abusé quand même mais assez drôle. Quant aux gars de Platinum Dunes, ils ne sont pas les seuls à faire des remakes moisis (surtout que certains le sont bien davantage que les leurs). J'ai bien aimé même les TCM et le V13. Mais c'est vrai que je redoute le remake de "A Nightmare...". La bande annonce ne m'a pas du tout emballé.
Pour finir, on oblige personne à aller les voir ces films. Je me souviens des réactions quand Gus Van Sant à fait son Psycho, tout le monde lui a craché dessus et pourtant, les années ont passé et on ne peut pas dire que tous ces remakes fassent des flops, étonnant, non ?